Analyzing the Hydrogen Supply Cost of Various Scenarios for A Blue Hydrogen Supply Chain Between Korea and Australia

Jiwon Cho; Namhwa Kim; Hyundon Shin

doi:10.32390/ksmer.2024.61.1.015

All Issue

2024 Vol.61, Issue 1 Preview Page Next Page

Research Paper

Analyzing the Hydrogen Supply Cost of Various Scenarios for A Blue Hydrogen Supply Chain Between Korea and Australia 한국-호주 간 청색수소 공급망 구축 시나리오별 수소 도입 단가 분석

28 February 2024. pp. 15-22

PDF XML

Abstract

Two scenarios were assumed to analyze the unit price of hydrogen implementation and build a blue hydrogen supply chain between Australia and Korea. Scenario 1 was the case of the unit price for transporting blue hydrogen produced at steam methane reforming (SMR) facilities in Australia to South Korea by three methods. Scenario 2 was the case of the unit price of hydrogen produced through domestic SMR facilities with CO₂ sequestration in Korea and Australia, respectively. Considering the various implementations and the unit price depending on the technology level and process efficiency, Monte Carlo simulation was used to calculate the implementation unit prices statistically. For scenario 1, the results were $12.4/kgH₂ (liquid hydrogen), $6.3/kgH₂ (ammonia), and $13.8/kgH₂ (liquid organic hydrogen carrier, LOHC). For scenario 2, they were $21.5/kgH₂ (Australia) and $13.7/kgH₂ (Korea), depending on CCS site location. This analysis showed that the implementation of blue hydrogen as ammonia in Australia is the most feasible option.

Keywords

blue hydrogen

CCS

supply chain

implementation cost

monte carlo simulation

호주와 한국 간 청색수소 공급망 구축을 위한 두가지 시나리오를 가정해 수소 도입 단가를 산출 및 비교하였다. 시나리오 1은 호주 내 SMR(steam methane reforming) 설비에서 생산된 청색수소를 한국으로 운송하는 경우이며, 수소의 선박 운송을 위한 저장 방법(액화수소, 암모니아, Liquid organic hydrogen carrier(LOHC))별 단가를 비교하였다. 시나리오 2는 국내 SMR 설비에서 수소 생산 시 발생하는 CO₂를 한국 또는 호주의 지중저장소에 격리하는 경우로 나누어 단가를 비교하였다. 도입 단가의 구성 비용은 기술에 따라 가변적이므로 몬테카를로 시뮬레이션으로 통계적 기반의 평균 도입 단가를 산출하였다. 시나리오 1은 $12.4/kgH₂(액화수소), $6.3/kgH₂(암모니아), $13.8/kgH₂(LOHC)의 도입 단가를 도출하였다. 시나리오 2는 $13.7/kgH₂(국내 CCS), $21.5/kgH₂(호주 CCS)의 도입 단가를 도출하였다. 이를 통해 현재 기술로는 호주에서 청색수소 생산 후 암모니아 형태로 국내 도입이 가장 경제적이다.

키워드

청색수소

CCS

공급망

수소 도입단가

몬테카를로 시뮬레이션

References

Al Ghafri, S.Z., Revell, C., Di Lorenzo, M., Xiao, G., Buckley, C.E., May, E.F., and Johns, M., 2023. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of LNG export for hydrogen production, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(23), p.8343-8369. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.160

Ali Khan, M.H., Daiyan, R., Neal, P., Haque, N., MacGill, I., and Amal, R., 2021. A framework for assessing economics of blue hydrogen production from steam methane reforming using carbon capture storage & utilisation, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(44), p.22685-22706. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.104

Allinson, G., Cinar, Y., Hou, W., and Neal, P.R., 2009. The costs of CO₂ transport and injection in Australia, School of Petroleum Engineering, the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. CO₂TECH Report Number RPT09-1536.

Energy Green house gas Total Information Platform Service (EG-TIPS), 2023.11.17., https://tips.energy.or.kr/carbon/Ggas_tatistics04.do

Gas news, 2023.4.22., http://www.gasnews.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=108984

Gibson-Poole, C.M., Edwards, S.E., Langford, R.P., and Vakarelov, B., 2007. Review of geological storage opportunities for carbon capture and storage (CCS) in Victoria-summary report, Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, ICTPL-RPT07-0526.

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 2018. An analytical study on the current status of hydrogen production, consumption, and distribution in Korea(in Korean), 2017 Convergence Technology Research Project Results Report, Gwangju, Korea, 42p.

Han, J.R., Park, J., Kim, Y., Lee, Y.C., and Kim, H.S., 2019. Analysis of CO₂ emission depending on hydrogen production methods in Korea, Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas, 23(2), p.1-8.

Hurskainen, M. and Ihonen, J., 2020. Techno-economic feasibility of road transport of hydrogen using liquid organic hydrogen carriers, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(56), p.32098-32112. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.186

Hydrogen Council, McKinsey & Company, 2021. Hydrogen Insights Report 2021, 48p

HYSTOC, 2018. LOHC production cost estimation study, HySTOC-D8.4, EU, 22p.

Hyundai Motor Group, 2022.12.17., https://www.hyundai.co.kr/story/CONT0000000000001839

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2023a. Energy Technology Perspectives 2023, International Energy Agency, Paris, 464p.

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2023b.12.27., https://www.iea.org/commentaries/is-carbon-capture-too-expensive

Kang, K., Huh, C., Kang, S.G., Baek, J.H., and Noh, H.J., 2014. Estimation of CO₂ pipeline transport cost in South Korea based on the scenarios, Energy Procedia, 63, p.2475-2480. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.270

Khindanova, I., 2013. A monte carlo model of a wind power generation investment, Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 15(1), p.94-106.

Kim, J.W. and Choi, J.H., 2017. A preliminary estimation of CCS injection cost with recycling injection equipments, Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers, 54(5), p.533-540. 10.12972/ksmer.2017.54.5.533

Korea Energy Economics Institute (KEEI), 2023.4.21., https://www.keei.re.kr/web_keei/d_results.nsf/main_all/60012D9EDBA1C8B749258A7C00304AB3/$file/%ED%95%9C%C2%B7%EC%9D%BC%20%EC%88%98%EC%86%8C%20%EC%A0%95%EC%B1%85%20%EB%B0%8F%20%EA%B8%B0%EC%88%A0%20%EB%8F%99%ED%96%A5%20%EB%B6%84%EC%84%9D.pdf

Korea Gas Union, 2023.8.17., https://www.kgu.or.kr/

Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP), 2023.1.24., https://www.kistep.re.kr/board.es?mid=a10306010000&bid=0031&b_list=10&act=view&list_no=34997&nPage=1&keyField=&orderby=

Korea National Oil Corporation (KNOC), 2023.11.17., https://www.knoc.co.kr/sub03/sub03_9.jsp

Korea Policy Briefing, 2022.12.17., https://www.korea.kr/briefing/pressReleaseView.do?newsId=156452841

Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), 2022.12.17., https://www.msit.go.kr/bbs/view.do?sCode=user&mId=113&mPid=112&bbsSeqNo=94&nttSeqNo=1490593

Raab, M., Maier, S., and Dietrich, R.U., 2021. Comparative techno-economic assessment of a large-scale hydrogen transport via liquid transport media, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(21), p.11956-11968. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.213

Wijayanta, A.T., Oda, T., Purnomo, C.W., Kashiwagi, T., and Aziz, M., 2019. Liquid hydrogen, methylcyclohexane, and ammonia as potential hydrogen storage: Comparison review, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(29), p.15026-15044. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.112

Information

Publisher :The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
Publisher(Ko) :한국자원공학회
Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
Journal Title(Ko) :한국자원공학회지
Volume : 61
No :1
Pages :15-22
Received Date : 2023-11-20
Revised Date : 2024-01-15
Accepted Date : 2024-02-27
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32390/ksmer.2024.61.1.015

Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources EngineersISSN:2288-0291(Print) 2288-2790(Online)한국자원공학회

All Issue